Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 409
Filter
1.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 25(1): 15-23, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38221907

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Terbinafine has been a cornerstone in dermatophyte infection treatment. Despite its global efficacy, the emergence of terbinafine resistance raises concerns, requiring ongoing vigilance. AREAS COVERED: This paper focuses on evaluating the efficacy and safety of terbinafine in treating dermatophyte toenail infections. Continuous and pulse therapies, with a 24-week continuous regimen and a higher dosage of 500 mg/day have demonstrated superior efficacy to the FDA approved regimen of 250 mg/day x 12 weeks. Pulse therapies, though showing comparable effectiveness, present debates with regards to their efficacy as conflicting findings have been reported. Safety concerns encompass hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal, cutaneous, neurologic, hematologic and immune adverse-effects, and possible drug interactions, suggesting the need for ongoing monitoring. EXPERT OPINION: Terbinafine efficacy depends on dosage, duration, and resistance patterns. Continuous therapy for 24 weeks and a dosage of 500 mg/day may enhance outcomes, but safety considerations and resistance necessitate individualized approaches. Alternatives, including topical agents and alternative antifungals, are to be considered for resistant cases. Understanding the interplay between treatment parameters, adverse effects, and resistance mechanisms is critical for optimizing therapeutic efficacy while mitigating resistance risks. Patient education and adherence are vital for early detection and management of adverse effects and resistance, contributing to tailored and effective treatments.


Subject(s)
Arthrodermataceae , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Foot Dermatoses , Nail Diseases , Onychomycosis , Humans , Terbinafine/adverse effects , Onychomycosis/drug therapy , Itraconazole/adverse effects , Naphthalenes/adverse effects , Foot Dermatoses/chemically induced , Foot Dermatoses/drug therapy , Antifungal Agents/adverse effects , Nail Diseases/chemically induced , Nail Diseases/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
8.
Contact Dermatitis ; 85(3): 297-306, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33882155

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis caused by shoes is common and new relevant allergens have been identified. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the pattern of type IV sensitization in patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis of the feet related to shoes as a presumed culprit trigger. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), 2009-2018. RESULTS: Six hundred twenty-five patients with presumed shoe dermatitis were identified in a cohort of 119 417 patients. Compared to patients with suspected contact sensitization from other allergen sources (n = 118 792), study group patients were more frequently sensitized to potassium dichromate (10.8% vs 3.5%), colophony (7.2% vs 3.7%), mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT; 4.0% vs 0.6%), mercapto mix (4.6% vs 0.6%), and p-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin (1.6% vs 0.5%). Sensitizations to urea formaldehyde resin, melamine formaldehyde resin, glutaraldehyde, tricresyl phosphate, and phenyl glycidylether were rare. Moreover, reactions to compounds in the leather or textile dyes test series were scarce. CONCLUSION: A distinct sensitization pattern was observed in patients with suspected allergy to shoe materials. Although substances with low sensitization rates should be removed from the leather and shoe patch test series, novel potential allergens should be added.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Foot Dermatoses/chemically induced , Patch Tests , Shoes/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Austria/epidemiology , Child , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Female , Foot Dermatoses/epidemiology , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Manufactured Materials/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Switzerland/epidemiology , Tanning , Textiles/adverse effects , Young Adult
9.
J Nippon Med Sch ; 88(3): 253-257, 2021 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32863343

ABSTRACT

We report a case of contact dermatitis caused by both efinaconazole, a topical triazole antifungal drug, and luliconazole, a topical imidazole antifungal drug. Positive patch test reactions were observed with efinaconazole and luliconazole. A patch test with lanoconazole also elicited a positive reaction. We hypothesized that structural similarity between luliconazole and lanoconazole led to cross-reaction, and that the dithiolane ring common to both drugs or the structure of the vinyl imidazole with a dithiolane ring could be the antigenic determinant. Since efinaconazole and luliconazole have no common structures, patients could be sensitized to both drugs separately. The antigenic determinant of efinaconazole is unknown. However, the chemical formula of ravuconazole, an oral triazole antifungal drug, is similar to that of efinaconazole. Clinicians should carefully consider potential cross-reactivity between these drugs.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Contact/etiology , Foot Dermatoses/chemically induced , Imidazoles/adverse effects , Triazoles/adverse effects , Administration, Topical , Aged , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Epitopes , Foot Dermatoses/drug therapy , Humans , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Male , Patch Tests , Triazoles/therapeutic use
10.
Dermatol Online J ; 26(8)2020 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32941722

ABSTRACT

A 61-year-old man with metastatic renal cell carcinoma on cabozantinib developed hand-foot skin reaction with predominantly dorsal involvement including painful violaceous plaques over the joints and keratotic yellow plaques on the palmar fingers. The medication was discontinued with resolution of the plaques and later reinitiated at a lower dose uneventfully.


Subject(s)
Anilides/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Hand Dermatoses/chemically induced , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Pyridines/adverse effects , Anilides/therapeutic use , Biopsy , Foot Dermatoses/chemically induced , Hand Dermatoses/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Skin/pathology
17.
Contact Dermatitis ; 82(4): 211-217, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31625171

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) of the feet accounts for approximately 10% of all patch tested patients. OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical profile of patients with feet dermatitis and relevant contact allergens in Spain over a 10-year period. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of patients with suspected ACD from the GEIDAC (Spanish Research Group on Contact Dermatitis and Cutaneous Allergy) baseline series from eight hospitals in Spain between 2004 and 2014. The clinical data collected from each patient were age, sex, occupation, history of atopic dermatitis, and eczema location. RESULTS: A total of 450 cases clinically presented dermatitis affecting the feet; of these, 41% of were males and 5.6% were suspected to be of occupational origin. As much as 47% were diagnosed with ACD, 20% with atopic dermatitis/dyshidrotic eczema, and 5% with psoriasis. The "feet group" included statistically significantly more females in the age range of 21 to 60 years. The most frequent relevant contact allergens were potassium dichromate, cobalt(II) chloride, p-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin, mercapto mix, and mercaptobenzothiazole. CONCLUSIONS: ACD is the most frequent clinical diagnosis of feet dermatitis in our series. The most frequent allergens are similar to those published in other series of foot ACD in Europe and the trend has not changed in the studied decade.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Foot Dermatoses/epidemiology , Adult , Cobalt/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Atopic/etiology , Dermatitis, Irritant/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Irritant/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Eczema, Dyshidrotic/epidemiology , Female , Foot Dermatoses/chemically induced , Humans , Male , Potassium Dichromate/adverse effects , Psoriasis/chemically induced , Psoriasis/epidemiology , Resins, Synthetic/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology , Sulfhydryl Compounds/adverse effects
19.
Cir Cir ; 87(S1): 38-42, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31501632

ABSTRACT

Capecitabine is a prodrug used primarily as a chemotherapeutic agent. Despite its good tolerance, it has several adverse effects, including the appearance of eruptive nevi. We present the case of a patient, with a history of EC IV breast adenocarcinoma and superficial extension melanoma, which developed 2 weeks after the start of therapy with capecitabine multiple eruptive palmoplantar pigmented lesions, with diverse benign dermatoscopic patterns. With the increasing incidence of solid tumors, these agents are being more used. It is important that the treating physician knows its adverse effects and apply non-invasive diagnostic tools like dermoscopy to avoid unnecessary biopsies.


La capecitabina es un profármaco utilizado sobre todo como medicamento quimioterapéutico. A pesar de su buena tolerancia, produce diversos efectos adversos como la aparición de nevos eruptivos. Se presenta el caso de una paciente, con antecedentes de adenocarcinoma de mama (EC IV) y melanoma de extensión superficial, que desarrolló dos semanas posteriores al inicio del tratamiento con capecitabina múltiples lesiones eruptivas pigmentadas palmoplantares, con patrones variados benignos a la dermatoscopia. Con el incremento de las neoplasias sólidas, estos agentes se utilizan cada vez más. Es importante que el médico tratante conozca sus efectos adversos y aplique herramientas diagnósticas no invasivas como la dermatoscopia para evitar biopsias innecesarias.


Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Capecitabine/adverse effects , Dermoscopy , Drug Eruptions/diagnostic imaging , Foot Dermatoses/chemically induced , Hand Dermatoses/chemically induced , Adenocarcinoma , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms , Capecitabine/therapeutic use , Diagnosis, Differential , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Female , Foot Dermatoses/diagnostic imaging , Hand Dermatoses/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Second Primary/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy
20.
BMJ Case Rep ; 12(8)2019 Aug 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31413063

ABSTRACT

This case report presents a patient who, while undergoing oral isotretinoin therapy for acne vulgaris, developed onychocryptosis and asymptomatic external urethritis. These uncommon adverse events are not well-documented in medical literature. While his urethritis spontaneously resolved, his onychocryptosis symptoms necessitated surgical intervention. This report illustrates both cosmetic and functional adverse effects of isotretinoin and provides insight into the progression of these reactions over time.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Foot Dermatoses/diagnosis , Isotretinoin/adverse effects , Onychomycosis/diagnosis , Urethritis/diagnosis , Acne Vulgaris/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Diagnosis, Differential , Foot Dermatoses/chemically induced , Foot Dermatoses/complications , Humans , Male , Onychomycosis/chemically induced , Onychomycosis/complications , Urethritis/chemically induced , Urethritis/complications
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...